ACTUAL GAS CONSUMPTION AMOUNTS FOR THE ETOBICOKE EDUCATION CENTRE ILLUSTRATING THE IMPACT OF EVAPORATIVE COOLING AND LOAD ANALYZING TECHNIQUES READING DATE GAS CONSUMPTION (X 100) AUG. 29/75 1,324.8 SEPT. 30/75 2,069.8 OCT. 30/75 1,965.1 DEC. 01/75 1,776.8 DEC. 30/75 1,930.1 JAN. 30/76 2,806.9 FEB. 27/76 2,308.1 MAR. 30/76 2,624.8 APRIL 29/76 1,749.6 MAY 28/76 1,676.1 JUNE 29/76 1,053.2 JULY 28/76 924.6 JAN. 26/77 9,168.4 FEB. 21/77 1,276.8 MAR. 22/77 1,192.7 APRIL 21/77 613.6 MAY 20/77 522.5 JUNE 21/77 609.2 JULY 21/77 683.7 AUG. 22/77 1,066.6 SEPT. 22/77 1,156.2 OCT. 21/77 1,328.5 NOV. 22/77 1,224.2 DEC. 21/77 815.1 JAN. 20/78 927.5 FEB. 20/78 1,078.8 MAR. 22/78 920.5 APRIL 21/78 771.2 MAY 19/78 526.8 INITIAL CONSERVATION DESIGN EMPLOYING EVAPORATIVE COOLING EFFECT OF THE HUMIDITY WATER SPRAYS. OTHER TECHNIQUES WERE IMPLEMENTED SIMULTANEOUSLY. THE WATER SPRAYS WERE REPLACED WITH STEAM HUMIDIFIERS CAUSING THE COOLING EFFECT TO BE LOST. AN ALTERNATE CONSERVATION CONTROL TECHNIQUE WAS DESIGNED AND INSTALLED. LOAD ANALYSING FROM THE WARMEST SAMPLE THERMOSTAT RE-ESTABLISHED THE CONSUMPTION REDUCTION. WHEN COMPARING THE GAS CONSUMPTION FOR THESE TWO SETS OF MONTHS, ONE FINDS JUNE AND JULY REQUIRED 13.5% MORE GAS Before THE CHANGES, THAN DECEMBER AND JANUARY REQUIRED AFTER THE CHANGES. 52.6% REDUCTION WITH EVAPORATIVE COOLING TECHNIQUE. 60% REDUCTION WITH ALTERNATE TECHNIQUE. 8.102
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODY1ODQy