REPORT PURPOSE This report’s focus is the fundamental science regarding an invention patented in Europe, Canada and the USA. The concept under consideration is when a diamond-shaped actuator and a conventional cylindrical shaped actuator oppose one another, with a common fluid source, there are two results observed: (1) The diamond-shaped actuator displaces a volume of fluid from the cylindrical actuator. The displaced volume is greater than the volume added to the diamond-shaped actuator. (2) The diamond-shaped actuator maintains >11% work potential, in each stroke, after attaining its own source of fluid from the cylindrical actuator. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE - Photographs of the cylindrical actuator and diamond-shaped actuator. 13.261 - Acknowledgement that scientist/engineers tested diamond-shaped actuators to be >15% more efficient than cylindrical actuators. 13.261 - Power relationship of opposing identical cylindrical actuators. 13.261 13.262 - Fluid volume relationship of identical cylindrical actuators. - Fluid volume relationship of cylindrical and diamond-shaped actuators. 13.262 - Photograph of physical model determining the percentage counter force required forcing pressurized fluid from a cylindrical actuator. 13.263 - Control drawing of circuitry relating to the photograph on page 3. 13.264 - Graph illustrating that a differential pressure of only 3.53% is required to force pressurized fluid from a cylindrical actuator. 13.265 - Report from Mr. Robert Blanchard P. Eng. 13.266 & 13.267 - Illustration of Mr. Blanchard’s findings concluding 16.9% efficiency advantage for a diamond-shaped actuator over cylindrical actuators. 13.268 - Letter from Dr. Rajendra K. Singh concluding >15% efficiency advantage for a diamond-shaped actuator over cylindrical actuators. 13.269 & 13.270 - Letter from Dr. Donald Gorber P. Eng. concluding 17% efficiency advantage for a diamond-shaped actuator over a cylindrical actuator. 13.271 & 13.272 Note that the differential in the model illustrated on page four is required to over-come the inertia of two cylindrical actuators. The >15% advantage witnessed by scientist/engineers was based on the diamond-shaped actuator causing motion; therefore, had over-come its inertia and the differential is required to over-come the inertia of only one cylindrical actuator. 13.260
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODY1ODQy