13.303 APS respects the advancement of science through practical methods with the goal of global environmental betterment. So, we ask all scientists to test our designs and drawings based on technical merits and not simply restating the Laws of Thermodynamics, but engage the drawing and designs and come to conclusions based on logical assessments, as the evolvement of science starts with the questioning of science itself. The questioning serves to either strengthen the pre-existing scientific understanding or belief, or it serves to advance science as a whole by changing the pre-existing scientific understanding or belief. So we ask everybody who reads this to be a part of science and the scientific process. Please send any questions or comments. Dave Strain President APS analystsofpneumatic@bellnet.ca Office—(905) 640-2333 Appendix A Some actual quotes from engineers’/scientists’ responses with respect to the invention, based only on their faith in the Laws of Thermodynamics: A. “You claim that the diamond-shaped actuator produces a greater displacement of fluid at a lower pressure than for a conventional piston-cylinder configuration. From this you conclude that there is an excess of energy output compared to the energy input. Although I confess to only a rudimentary understanding of your principle of operation, I cannot accept the conclusion that this device would produce more energy output than is put in.” ...Same letter... “Finally, I must admit that I cannot fully understand your arguments. Regretfully, though, from what I already know I doubt that I could be persuaded that this device is a perpetual motion machine as you claim.” (University Engineering Professor and Engineering text author) B. “Quite frankly, I reject outright any proposal that claims to overcome the basic laws of physics.” (University Professor and environmental organization leader.) C. “As you know, your results contradict the First Law of Thermodynamics. Despite numerous attempts over the centuries to demonstrate otherwise, this fundamental Law has never been violated. In fact, the theory and all available evidence support this Law so strongly that we hold it as true. All modern science and technologies are developed and work based on the truth of this Law. Examples of experiments, demonstrations, and machines developed and/or built that purportedly invalidate this Law, have, without exception, all been shown to be false.” (University Professor and director of applied technology at that University.)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODY1ODQy